Aristotle’s Four Causes: Demystifying Manifestation

Navigating Aristotle’s Wisdom for Real-World Success

In this article, I aim to offer insights into the process of Manifestation. In essence, the process of Manifestation is a process of Creation, where we bring into reality a new element that didn’t exist before.

Unfortunately, the term “Manifestation” (and “Mindset” for this matter) has been degraded by its overuse. The simplicity with which some Self-proclaimed gurus and others employ this term, in my view, undermines the value and credibility of the process.

In my upcoming book, “Primal Alchemy,” I explore deeply into the concept of Manifestation, its process, and its legitimacy. It’s crucial to understand that Manifestation isn’t akin to magic; there are no hidden mystical forces that conjure something from nothing. This understanding while may be clear to some, unfortunately, remains hidden to others. Those who believe that mere meditation and visualization can magically transform their desires into reality are, unfortunately for them, misled. I hold the commercialization machine behind the guru and “dream sellers” trend responsible for this misconception. They misuse the potent tools of meditation and mindfulness and promise miracles if you simply follow their program for seven minutes a day or visualize your “end game” as if it were already achieved. Needless to say, this is far from the truth.

Nevertheless, this doesn’t imply that the power of Manifestation and Creation is unattainable. I firmly believe and am certain of its reality. The dispute revolves around the “method” and “matter.”

Here, I seek guidance from one of the most brilliant minds in history — Aristotle! However, before I bring him to the forefront, let me emphasize that Manifestation is fundamentally a process of Creation. The term “create” implies “work,” “action,” “planning,” and “execution.” These are methodical aspects that, in their essence, are technical, mostly measurable, and physical. But there’s more to it than that. In order to complement the physical efforts, a strong and resilient mind and character need to act as the foundation of the physical structure. Here, we can explore the inner powers of the mind and the Self, the undeniable influence of the subconscious mind, and the necessity to cultivate a strong, supportive mindset.

In this realm of the Self and the inner forces of power within us, the art of mindfulness, understanding the power of the will, and enhancing awareness through meditation, sound waves, and seizing the present moment are the cornerstones on which our Manifestation, and thus, Creation, will come to fruition.

There are no free meals and there are no magical tricks. Manifestation requires un-compromised level of methodology backed up by unshakable resilience of Self and mindset. Those are two organs that one cannot exist, or at the very least cannot thrive and flourish, without the other.

Each circle has its own methodology and tools. We need to make sure that our resources in time and energy and even money sometimes, need to be allocated to support both circles so they can coexist in synergy and feed each other rather than devour each other. 

Of course, in this short article, originally intended to spotlight Aristotle, I cannot fully expand on this topic; it could fill numerous pages. In my books “Primal Alchemy” and “On the Path to Wealth,” I explore these aspects in depth from various perspectives.

Now, what’s the connection to Aristotle?

In my contemporary interpretation, Aristotle’s philosophy suggests that the hidden potential of our universe can be brought to life in the tangible world of reality. Aristotle’s “Metaphysics” is a work that delves into the nature of existence and reality. Aristotle posited that everything in the physical world comprises “form” and “matter.” “Form” gives essential characteristics and identity, defining what a thing is, while “matter” represents potentiality, the underlying ‘stuff’ that, undetectable to us, can assume various forms. In this context, “matter” isn’t necessarily tangible in its own right but becomes tangible when it takes on “form,” transforming into the physical objects we perceive in our reality. This might raise some eyebrows, as most would argue that “matter” is known and tangible to us, let’s consider wood or steel as examples; what we perceive as “matter” is simply the shape of the substance of wood or steel, whether it’s a tree or grains of steel buried deep in the earth. Trying to conceive of “matter” without its shape would make grasping the substance nearly impossible, as our minds can only perceive that substance in some kind of shape, not in its pure form. This leads us to the conclusion that “matter” isn’t inherently physical or tangible; we can identify the essence of “matter” primarily by the shape it assumes.

In short, In Aristotle’s metaphysics, everything in the physical world combines “matter” and “form,” known as Hylomorphism. “matter” represents the potential or substance underlying things, while “form” is the actuality, the specific characteristics and arrangement that confer identity upon a thing.

Understanding this argument sheds light on the connection between Aristotle’s philosophy and Manifestation. If we apply this philosophy and replace “form” and “matter” with “reality” and “thought,” “thought,”being the matter, can assume shape and “form” in the physical world, we refer to as Manifestation. Aristotle believed that metaphysics explore the fundamental principles of reality. He believed that everything in existence serves a specific purpose and function, and these can be comprehended through observation and reason. He asserted that the ultimate reality is the unmoved mover, a pure form of thought and knowledge that both creates and sustains everything in the world, referred to as “Hylomorphism.”

So, This concept of materialization and Manifestation aligns with Aristotle’s teachings. Aristotle’s metaphysics also includes his famous concept of the “four causes,” which he considered essential for comprehending the causes of natural phenomena. He emphasized the importance of understanding the four causes underlying the existence and actuality of a form or reality. By exploring the material cause, the formal cause, the efficient cause, and the final cause, we gain insight into the essence and purpose of our creations. Applying these principles empowers us to shape our intentions and goals with a deeper understanding of their significance.

This tool of the four causes is intuitive yet ingenious in its concept. Aristotle suggests that when we examine anything to determine its nature, we should approach it with these four causes in this sequence:

1. The material cause: What substance or essence comprises this object?
2. The formal cause: How does this object take shape?
3. The efficient cause: How was this object brought into existence?
4. The final cause: What is the purpose of creating this object?

The four causes of Aristotle propose a method of examination to understand the nature of an object or subject.

In the evaluation or assessment process, it’s crucial to explore the intricate interplay between the various causes and factors contributing to the existence of an action or object. The final cause sheds light on the purpose and goal, providing a sense of intention. Understanding the efficient cause enables us to discern the agents or forces responsible for initiating and driving the action forward. The formal cause offers insight into the structure and organization shaping the action’s Manifestation. Lastly, the material cause unveils the underlying substance forming the basis of the action.

While examining an existing object or situation implies its existence, I agree that this concept has limited relevance to the Manifestation of the abstract, such as a thought or idea, into reality, like success or achievement. Nevertheless, the four causes can guide us in evaluating a certain reality or state of reality. During the evaluation process, when we need insights into the nature or contribution of a reality to our goals, the four causes provide a ‘Methodical Approach’. The four causes guide us through this process systematically, so that in the end, we will have an answer driven from the purpose of this object or reality concerning its contribution to our endeavors and goals.

For instance, during our efforts to accomplish a particular goal or task, when an opportunity or risk presents itself and aligns with our intention, then according to  Aristotle’s model it’s imperative to assess this opportunity (or risk) using the four causes guideline. What is this opportunity (or risk) made of? Is it stocks, real estate, or a new market competitor? What form does this opportunity take? Is it a service, a product, an investment, a collaboration, or a marketing opportunity? How does it materialize? Does it involve trading, adapting our business strategy, or acquiring new knowledge or skills? Lastly, and in my view, the most crucial question is, what purpose does this opportunity or risk serve? How would it impact my plans and endeavors, positively or negatively? This analysis ultimately leads to the conclusion of whether it’s worth allocating resources to address it or not.

Being far less smarter than Aristotle, I propose using the same tool of the four causes as a means of Creation and Manifestation. In this context, I suggest using the questions in reverse order, starting with the purpose and working backward to how to make it happen, proceeding to the shape, and concluding with the inquiry of its substance or material.

In the planning phase, we have a goal based within an aspiration compressed into an idea within our minds. Here, in order to work toward the realization of this idea, we should approach it using the four causes in reverse order:

1. What is the purpose of this idea? How will it contribute to my vision, goals, or life in general once it’s manifested? In essence, how does it answer the “Why” question, which underlies the initial idea?
2. Next, we move to the manner of materialization. What actions are necessary to turn this idea into reality? What steps must be taken, and what enhancements are required?
3. The third question, concerning its form, prompts us to consider what shape this Manifestation of matter — the idea — will take. Will it manifest as wealth, knowledge, happiness, growth, or any other form aligned with the idea?
4. The final question is perhaps the simplest, focusing on the matter from which this new reality is made. Is it money, a home, luxury vehicles, family, or other components that imbue the form with meaningful, usable achievements contributing to my objectives? Note that in this example the matter is tangible and physical, but it can also be something abstract like, happiness, wealth, health, honor, respect and other abstract elements that strike meaning to our form of achievement.

In short, our reality comprises two interdependent factors within the same world: “matter” and “form.” These two elements cannot exist independently; they are inextricably linked. This differs from Aristotle’s teacher, Plato, for example, who developed his own philosophy on Manifestation. Plato postulated the existence of two realms: one was the “world of forms,” housing the abstract and somewhat divine, while the other was the “physical world” where we reside. In Plato’s philosophy, “matter” and “form” (though he didn’t use those precise terms) occupied different dimensions, with the world of forms constituting true reality and our world being a flawed shadow of it  (we will explore this concept in a different article exploring plato’s  “Allegory of the Cave” )Nonetheless, both philosophers acknowledged the concept of Manifestation and the potential to materialize the abstract into the physical.

Revisiting Aristotle’s philosophy, we recognize methodical thinking and logical progression. Moreover, we grasp the idea of Creation through the required actions to transform an idea into reality or manifest our desires.

Through this “Holistic Approach,” we acquire a deeper comprehension of the interconnections and dependencies that shape our actions. As we expand our awareness and delve into the intricacies of matter and form, we reveal concealed patterns, root causes, and potential areas for growth. This process not only empowers us to make deliberate choices but also enables us to harmonize our actions with our desired outcomes. It offers us the opportunity for continual growth and evolution, refining our understanding and catalyzing positive change in our lives.

This comprehensive concept demands empirical thinking blended with spiritual awareness. It necessitates our readiness to adjust our mindsets, beliefs, and habits to a defined course of action guided by an abstract intention, aimed at a desired outcome in our lives.

So, 

is Manifestation possible? It certainly is.

Is it achieved through magic or a seven-minute daily music piece? Hell No!

In the end of this journey I want to leave you with this thought : 

Imagine how different the world would be if Thomas Edison hadn’t conceived the idea of the light bulb or had given up after numerous failed attempts, driven by unwavering faith in his concept. Or if the Wright brothers hadn’t dreamed of flight and abandoned their quest after their first crash? 

And the list goes on… 

Our reality today would be significantly different, wouldn’t it?

(Note: The interpretation of Aristotle’s four causes method as a Manifestation tool is solely the writer’s contemporary perspective and was not part of Aristotle’s original philosophy.)

Discover my book, On The Path To Wealth, and start your journey to success

SLAM equips leaders with the tools to unlock their potential, fostering self-awareness, strategic thinking, and impactful decision-making. This comprehensive approach inspires trust, drives innovation, and empowers leaders to create lasting change within their organizations.